Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 8th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

42-day debate



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 July 2008
I'M in broad agreement with the Guardian and Herald comment (June 13) on the MPs' vote to allow terrorist suspects to be detained for 42 days without charge.
Opinion polls may reveal that 69 per cent of the public favour police having more powers, but I'm sceptical.

The experience of the 1984/85 miners' strike showed that powers given to the state affecting the liberty of the subject can be used badly
.

We were told that the security services were pressing for this legislation, but MI5 have not asked for it and senior figures in the legal establishment have openly opposed the 42 day detention plan.

Talking to people at work, in the pub, on the bus or whilst out shopping, folk often express concern about issues affecting themselves such as pay and prices.

The 42 day detention plan seems to be the last of their worries, and yet the Prime Minister put his head on the block to push it through parliament. A shadow cabinet minister resigned over the issue.

The key for me is that people are innocent until proven guilty.

In the same issue of the Guardian and Herald Wyke Manor School has been told it could face closure if exam results don't improve and that plans are in place to transform it into a state of the art academy.

Wyke Manor has been identified among 638 failing schools in this country.

Twenty six of these 'failing schools' are already academies.

Rather than improve standards, academies tend to exclude the students they think will lower their league table rating - including children with special needs and those from poorer backgrounds.

In the first wave of academies, over half were defined as 'failing'.

The number of children achieving grade C or above in five GCSEs was less than half the average.

Academies have not improved education, they are about pushing for privatisation.

What's the most important? Enriching private academy sponsors or giving children a decent education?

JOHN APPLEYARD
Firthcliffe Parade
LIVERSEDGE





The full article contains 335 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 July 2008 12:24 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Spenborough
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.